By Jacob Klein
The Meno, the most largely learn of the Platonic dialogues, is obvious afresh during this unique interpretation that explores the discussion as a theatrical presentation. simply as Socrates's listeners might have wondered and tested their very own considering in line with the presentation, so, Klein indicates, should still sleek readers get involved within the drama of the discussion. Klein bargains a line-by-line observation at the textual content of the Meno itself that animates the characters and dialog and thoroughly probes every one major flip of the argument.
Originally released in 1965.
A UNC Press Enduring variation -- UNC Press Enduring variants use the newest in electronic expertise to make to be had back books from our special backlist that have been formerly out of print. those versions are released unaltered from the unique, and are offered in cheap paperback codecs, bringing readers either old and cultural value.
Read Online or Download A Commentary on Plato's Meno PDF
Similar greek & roman books
Aeschylus' Oresteia , Sophocles' Oedipus performs, Euripides' Medea and Bacchae , and Aristophanes' Birds and Lysistrata are mentioned during this full of life and scholarly quantity. The author's event educating those performs to proficient highschool scholars makes this quantity quite important. The drama fairs, the variations of fable, the relevance of Aristotelian standards, and the political and cultural history of every play are defined totally, and the character of tragedy and comedy, plot development, stagecraft, subject, personality, imagery and person odes and speeches are analyzed extensive.
Socrates and felony legal responsibility used to be first released in 1981. Minnesota Archive variants makes use of electronic know-how to make long-unavailable books once more obtainable, and are released unaltered from the unique college of Minnesota Press variants. Charged with "impiety" and sentenced to loss of life less than the legislations of Athens, Socrates didn't attempt to disprove the costs or to flee demise, yet particularly held to another type of rhetoric, aiming no longer at persuasion yet at fact.
The earliest thinker whose paintings has survived greatly, Plato continues to be the starting-point within the examine of good judgment, metaphysics, and ethical and political philosophy. R. M. Hare presents a concise, well-connected advent to Plato's dialogues, targeting the vital difficulties which led Plato to turn into a thinker.
It has lengthy been famous that any one heavily attracted to Aristotle's ethical philosophy might want to take complete account of the Eudemian Ethics, a piece nonetheless gravely overlooked in prefer of the better-known Nicomachean Ethics. The relation among the 2 remains to be the topic of full of life scholarly debate.
- Plato and the Post-Socratic Dialogue: The Return to the Philosophy of Nature
- The Art and Thought of Heraclitus: An Edition of the Fragments with Translation and Commentary
- Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy: Volume XXVII: Winter 2004 (Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy)
- Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics in Ancient Thought: Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji
- Metaphysics: Books Z and H (Clarendon Aristotle Series)
Additional resources for A Commentary on Plato's Meno
Ingful in the context of the dialogue. i, memini, mens, mind. 3 2 W e note that in the n a m e " M e n o " the sequence of those two letters is somewhat deranged. As to the content and syntax of the second sentence, 33 w h a t seems to be common to the two subjects, " h e " and "you," is not c o m m o n to both, a n d it is the particle te which carries this ambiguity: Gorgias might well know what arete is, while M e n o m i g h t merely know what Gorgias said it is. T h e difference seems crucial.
Cf. Wilamowitz, Plalo I I , p. 144). 16. Cf. E. S. Thompson, The Meno of Plato, 1901, pp. X I X L; Friedlander, Platon II, 1957 (German edition), p. 255. dialogue. W e should not overlook the "example" "which Socrates gives early in the conversation and in a casual m a n n e r while bringing u p an apparently more important and more comprehensive problem: ". . " (71 b 4 - 7 ) . 2. T h e dialogue begins abruptly with Meno asking Socrates: " C a n you, Socrates, tell me, is h u m a n excellence (arete) somet h i n g teachable?
Even if there are many different aretai, says Socrates, they all have a certain aspect, one a n d the same, m i n d you, in virtue of which they are w h a t they are, namely aretai (hen ge ti eidos taiiton hapasai echousi, di' ho eisin aretai) . " a n d to make manifest what it is, one should, I suppose, says Socrates, keep one's eye on what looks like that "one a n d the same" in all the variety. " T h i s word eidos reminds us, n o less t h a n it may have r e m i n d e d Plato's contemporaries, of that "much babbleda b o u t " 4 1 doctrine, the "doctrine of ideas," linked with Socrates' and Plato's names.